Heavily hand-edited version of the "First Impressions" section of the report, with additional fieldnotes appended. Undated but seems to be an intermediate version between the first fieldnotes from 1979 (Document 114) and the revised versions (Documents 81, 82 and 83)
Draft of part of the conclusion to the Final Report describing the organisation of learning at Rafael Hernandaez School and the role of bilingual instruction through the grades of the school. Written by Saville Kushner in 1982.
A draft from May 1982 of a section of the final report "Limitations of the Case Study", part of which appeared as the final section of the book of the project. An important point that is made is that the team saw themselves not as writing a 'case study of the school' but of 'the issues and conditions of bilingual teaching', and this distinction was not appreciated by school staff.
Corrected, typewritten draft of Clem Adelman's section of the report on “How the Research was Conducted” containing details of how classroom observation was organised and the questions that were emerging, as well as the concerns on the part of staff about the intentions of the team. Later than, but substantially the same as, Document 153 (CARE 1-12-004).
Typewritten draft of Clem Adelman's section of the report on “How the Research was Conducted” containing details of how classroom observation was organised and the questions that were emerging, as well as his report of the suspicions on the part of the staff. Earlier version of Document 170.
A draft from July 1982 of the final section of the final report, including a review of the research design and a timetable of how events actually unfolded, in comparison with the proposed timeline. It also highlights several of the major points of difficulty that were encountered: the dissatisfaction of school staff with the portrayal of the school, and their concerns about the CARE teams' contact with policymakers while simultaneously having access the the school.
A Second draft of Saville Kushner's section of the report on Designs, Methods and Performances. It differs from the previous version in that (among other things), it adds more detail to the project chronology, and also relates the 'condensed fieldwork' used in the evaluation to Ethnography and Portrayal approaches.
Description of Boston's School District VI along with descriptions of bilingual program, students and curriculum of specific schools. This seems to have been produced as part of the 'Complementary Studies' programme after September 1979 - this is a photocopy of the report and has been annotated in a few places by a member of the CARE team.
Copy of review by Josue M. Gonzalez of the full draft report in which he comments on the structure (the difference between the first, historical section and the school study is mentioned) and raises the question of how typical (or rather atypical) Rafael Hernandez School is. Gonzalez suggests that to some extent at least, the case study is propagating 'myths' rather than presenting a picture of bilingual schooling as a movement to ensure access to the curriculum.
